All insights
OperationsInternal Tooling · 5 min read
Internal documentation people actually read
Most internal docs are written once, never updated, and quietly distrusted. A few habits make the difference between a wiki and a graveyard.
Documentation has a credibility problem. The moment a doc is wrong once, people stop trusting all of them and go back to asking a human. So the bar isn’t 'write more docs' it’s 'write docs people believe.'
Stale docs are worse than none
An out-of-date doc actively misleads. It costs more than no doc because someone follows it and ends up further from the answer. Trust, once broken, takes a long time to rebuild.
What earns trust
- Owned: every doc has a name attached and a last-reviewed date.
- Close to the work: docs live where the task happens, not in a far-off wiki.
- Short: the shortest version that’s still correct gets read; the exhaustive one doesn’t.
- Maintained by the system: where possible, generate docs from the source of truth.
Nobody trusts a doc that’s been wrong once. Write fewer, keep them true.